Meetings All Day


On teams doing a 2 week Sprint, the Sprint Review, Sprint Retrospective, and Sprint Planning events might fit into a single, working day. With so many events, they may feel packed in tighter than sardines. This concentration of events has pro’s and con’s:



Leaves 9 full days for focused development

Context from Sprint Review and Sprint Retrospective is fresh for Sprint Planning

Provides “rest” from development

May be more convenient for stakeholders who can only visit for a single day

Less time leads to smaller time boxes and pressure to be efficient


More casual pace

Larger time boxes possible if needed (within Scrum guide limits)

Provides “rest” from development



A FULL DAY OF MEETINGS EVENTS (read: tiring an tough to facilitate at times)

Events may not be given large enough time boxes (within Scrum Guide limits)

Stakeholders shared among projects may not be available for multiple reviews


Could break up development time and lead to waste

Some stakeholders may not be able to stay more than a day consistently

Helpful Sprint Review and Retrospective context may be lost before Planning

Time boxes might “grow” larger than are necessary leading to lack of engagement during meandering meetings.


Given all these things, I would still tend to prefer a single-day set of events rather than a 2-day affair; however, I’m open to hearing how you are doing. Do you agree with the pros and cons listed above? Would you add some of your own? How are you all conducting your Sprint Events?



Jason is a developer, Scrum Master, writer, teacher, coach, husband, father, and community leader out of Tulsa Oklahoma. He's been delivering software since 2007 and absolutely loves the values and principles of agility especially as given form by the Scrum framework.